The Missional Network

Welcome to The Missional Network Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Another Shape for Church Planting?

Last post 09-17-2007, 3:46 PM by Erik Brewer. 3 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  03-30-2007, 3:27 PM 966

    Another Shape for Church Planting?

    How can a church planting movement spring from the current attractional/evangelistic model we are using to plant churches?  Granted, the Holy Spirit can do whatever He wants, even through our flawed strategies and objectives.  But really, how can a church planting movement (multiplication of diciples and churches) spring from an inherently consumeristic approach to church growth?  Is it possible that the proliferation of newer, hipper churches (of which I've successfully planted two) is actually just pandering to changes in the consumer market (and creating younger hipper consumers of religious goods and services)?  And if so, how can we attract (and keep) people with a consumeristic approach, while simulateously leading them to become the antithesis of a consumer: a disciple of Christ?   The disconnect (bait and switch?) is apparent to the unchurched folks I hang with.

    I'm growing increasingly convinced that it can't be done, because our consumer driven practices undermine the incarnational/missional impulse (to borrow the phrase from Alan Hirsch) within the churh.  In other words, when we focus on planting churches, we lose sight of the mission.  When we focus on the mission (which requires us to incarnate the Gospel and go out rather than attract with felt needs and gather in), churches will follow (again borrowing words from Hirsch).

    So what's your take?  Is the Spirit leading His people in a new direction, away from programmatic churches to more incarnational expressions of the body of Christ?

  •  06-23-2007, 2:25 AM 1001 in reply to 966

    Re: Another Shape for Church Planting?

    It has been my joy to have a part in the planting of a number of churches in the United States and in Latin America directly.  I have seen a number of models and have observed what is in my estimation most successful.

     Since I am not a leader with dynamic or charismatic personality, obviously I have not even attempted to use, as you say, "the current attractional/evangelistic model". I am so "un-hip" that I'm sure I wouldn't know how.  If, indeed, that method is flawed (and I believe it is), you are right in that the Holy Spirit can use anything to glorify Christ.  Paul in Philippians wrote of people who preached Christ from various motives, but he rejoiced that Christ was preached nevertheless.  No doubt these methods that I would never use nor be able to use are being used by God.

    Those who know the churches I have participated in planting know that they are all small.  None has over 75 members, but there are a number of them.  They are of three ethnicities--majority White but with other racial-ethnic groups as well, all Black, and Hispanic.  A few were planted as the result of a demographic study and recommendation of a missions committee.  None of those, I think, is an effective church that I would lift up as a model to anyone.  They became miniature "First Baptist Churches" that maintain the cultural status quo of their communities and do not challenge nor engage the culture.

     The most successful church plant I have experienced is the church of which I am now pastor.  It resulted when a flood cut part of the church family off from attending what came to be considered the mother church.  A somewhat "temporary" effort to continue our ministry to those people "across the water"  became in a few months a successful church plant.  There was no division, no conscious planning.  It just seemed to be a God-thing.  Those who are familiar with Calvary Chapel (Southern Baptist Convention--no relationship  to a group called Calvary Chapels--we didn't even know it existed) of Parchman, MS, staff-church at Mississippi State Penitentiary, know of its missional nature.  Before there were officially Global Priority Churches or Acts 1:8 churches in our denomination, that's what we were.  But my point is, nobody did a study and decided that we would plant a church.  We just became overwhelmed that there was a need and we must meet it.

    When we got involved with African-American ministry, we were approached by African-Americans and were asked to help, sort of a Macedonian call.  We responded much as did Peter when he met Cornelius.

     Our success in Hispanic ministry came quite providentially, totally unexpected.  I am a bivocational pastor-Spanish teacher.  In 1998 a Mexican immigrant got lost and came to our door looking for a Spanish mass at a Catholic church 50 miles away.  In North Mississippi the odds are very slim n finding any evangelical pastor who speaks Spanish.  But he came to OUR door.  He was welcomed by people who did not speak the language but who knew a sort of "Pentecostal" language that everyone can understand--"welcoming love".  I was introduced to the man and invited him to stay.  I did the message and a song bilingually, thinking he would never return.  A week later he brought a friend.  They brought two more and soon there were 60.  The 60 became groups of believers in the towns from which they came.  Before they were saved they were meeting together, and soon they became churches and missions in three other towns.  Quickly they spread to two more towns.  Our only involvement was to fan the flames, to encourage them in their new-found faith and their desire to serve the Lord.  Today they have spread to 15 towns.  None of them is "impressive" in the way Southern Baptists usually guage success, but they are missional in nature.  Some meet in abandoned church buildings, some meet in borrowed church space of other congregations, some meet in houses and are little more than "cells". They are growing, and every time someone moves from them, he/she seems to take the Gospel with them and plant another church in their new locale.  Sort of an Acts 8:4 thing--"those who were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the Word".

    From these groups God is raising up preachers.  All of them are bivocational, mostly unpaid volunteers.  Some of them become their pastors.  Some announce that they are "going home" to reach their village in their mother country.  That to me, is MISSIONAL.

     I'm sorry to tell you that I had nothing to do with it other than by the grace of God being in the right place when God was at work.  It would be wonderful if I could tell you that in my God-given ability I had planted all these churches.  But the truth is, I was just there and had the joy of watching it and being a part.

     Once overseas on a mission "trip" I was asked to go to the gate of a school and announce to the crowd waiting at the gate for admission to our medical clinic that the medicine was all gone and we could see no other patients.  I used Acts 3:6 and paraphrased by saying we had nop medicine but I would give something eternal that I had, and I preached to them Jesus.  17 adults and teens from the large crowd raised their hands to announce that they accepted Christ.  Truthfully, I suspected that they thought somehow this would get them some medicine we secretly had stored nearby.  However, a few weeks later someone in that country emailed me a picture of 17 people lined up for baptism at the edge of a mountain lake near where I preached that sermon of sorts.  They didn't tell me they were the same person, but when I counted the number to be 17, I felt sure I had been standing on holy ground that day.  A God-moment.  And I think that's what real church-planting is.

    I now have the title of mission strategist.  My strategy is this:  do all you can to fan the flames when the fire of God breaks out.  Plant seed wherever you can, wherever you happen to be going. When some of it sprouts,  cultivate it, irrigate it, fertilize it.  The result will be new missional churches.

    If planting the seed seems to you to be an attractional/evangelistic model, then do it.  That's better than doing nothing as so many of our critics do. I can't say that the Spirit is leading all His people away from planting programmatic churches to a more incarnational expression of the body of Christ, but my viewpoint  is that He's doing it that way in my experience.    Joe Young

     

     


    Hermano Jose, the Bivo Joe
  •  08-03-2007, 3:37 AM 1012 in reply to 1001

    Re: Another Shape for Church Planting?

    To experience a Church Planting Movement we will have to get serious about doing a couple of things!  First, we will need to get serious about creating a truly reproducable model that anyone, even at the lowest level of leadership, can reproduce.  The reason why so many of our church models have difficulty reproducing is that they require a certain level of leadership capabilities that limits number of people who can participate in the church planting endeavor.  If you create a very simple church structure that can easily be reproduced and adapted to different settings, cultures and generations then you have something that can be handed to the masses of believers to reproduce.  This church structure will probably look like a house church or simple church. 

     Secondly, we need to seriously look at who can be a church planter!  If we truly want to see North America saturated with healthy, indigneous and reproducing churches we will need to seriously recruit, train and hand over church planting over to the lay people in our churches that God is going to raise up to start these new churches.  Professional church planters need to make sure that they only start a new house church with using lay people whom they can mentor in church planting.  Then as these lay people experience the process they will be better equipped within six months to go and start their own. 

    If these two issues are addressed maybe we will see God give the nod in blessing us with a church planting movement.

  •  09-17-2007, 3:46 PM 1035 in reply to 966

    Re: Another Shape for Church Planting?

    I am a missionary to Eastern Europe. While there I have had the privilege of working with several types of planted churches, planted through different means. I divide the church plants into two categories, those that form a service and then invite people to come, usually after some type of mass evangelism and the second is a church that starts from an in-home, small group Bible study. The churches that endure and grow seem to be of the second nature. Those of the first nature usually take off faster but either hit a plateau or divide and crumble during the first conflict, usually minor in the beginning but turning into major rather quickly. The second type does not take off as dynamically, usually a core group is trained by doing Bible study together with the leader and then they begin to reach out, sharing the Gospel with their friends, families, and coworkers. One unique thing that is done in the country of Moldova, where my wife and I are missionaries, is that we teach our students the Bible through the English language. We have a manual that they study, which is based on the Gospel of John, and as they learn English they also learn the Word of God. After completing a program they then get trained as teachers and begin to do ministry using the same method. So as the number of students grow so does the number of people who attend the church plant. These people are firmly planted in the Word of God from the beginning and have a desire to reach out, one on one with others, bringing them to Christ, teaching them the Word of God, and giving them a tool through which they can also do ministry as well, all being done at the same time. We do the same with computers, sports, and just about anything that will get people interested in studying with us.  The beauty of it is that it begins with small groups and promotes the formation of other small groups which come together to form a church, a church full of disciples of Jesus Christ, eager to study the Word of God and share It with others.
View as RSS news feed in XML